On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Hey guys, >>>> If you all remember, after the last archweb release, we had to offload >>>> the todolists (package IDs no longer matched, and it was all complex >>>> to convert, so we deferred it). >>>> >>>> Well, I'm going to re-add the ones that we still need (i.e. DB rebuilds) >>>> >>>> I dumped all the old lists here: >>>> http://dev.archlinux.org/~aaron/todolists.txt >>>> Please take a look at the top section, and let me know which lists can >>>> be deleted and which are still useful if you can. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Aaron >>> >>> The Broken Licenses TODO should probably be regenerated if we're going >>> to re-add it - in fact, since it was generated by a script anyways, we >>> could probably incorporate it into the weekly sanity-check that goes >>> out. I'll have a look at the script I wrote and adapt it to the new >>> directory structure. >> >> The reporead.py script that dumps the pacman DBs to the web interface >> sends me emails every night that contain this info. Let me forward one >> to the list. I could probably set it up to email once a week too. > > Took a look at the output - it looks good, but I only see "No license" > messages - nothing that checks for the validity of entries within the > licenses array, which was what my script checked. For example, it > ensured that the items in the array were either licenses contained in > /usr/share/licenses/common or "custom" - and that the ones using a > "custom" license referenced /usr/share/licenses somewhere in their > build() function.
Ah nice, then that would be useful
