Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> start_udev is still there because people were jackasses and didn't > >> update initscripts when they updated udev.... or something.. I can't > >> remember the issue, but it was people being foolish and expecting > >> their systems to boot fine. > >> > >> Is everyone ok with removing it? > > > > A suggestion was made 3 times to simply add a conflict line : > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11112#comment31331 > > > > This is just a safety against foolish people. > > Added locally. > > Copied from arch-general (whoops, replied to the wrong list) regarding > the readme file we ship with the udev package > > > Actually, I think we should remove this file. Reloading rules and all > > that is covered by the man pages and any arch specific documentation > > should be added to a wiki page so anyone can edit it. > > > > Any issues with removing this? We don't ship custom readme's with any > > other packages that I know of. > > Additionally, do we need the migrate-udev script anymore? I sincerely > hope not. Any qualms with killing THAT off too?
migrate udev creates device nodes which might be necessary, i wouldn't kill it. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
