Am Samstag 30 August 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Freitag 29 August 2008 12:27:50 schrieb Thomas Bächler: > >> - nano > >> Do we really need another editor in base? Let's leave it in core, remove > >> it from base. > > > > This might end up in a flamwar, but if we have to remove one editor I > > would vote vor vim and keep nano. vi is a lot more than a simple text > > editor and installs about 24MB while nano is only about 1140KB. :-) > > LOL. Let's just keep them both please.
hrm tcp_wrappers, it includes host.deny and allow. Do we need it in base? All tools with network realtionship are not in base anyway like sshd or nfs. Just my 2c about tcp_wrappers greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.