On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tonight I noticed the presence of sha1sums in a couple of PKGBUILDs I > adopted. Are we adopting a new policy toward sha1sums? Did I miss > the memo?
Which packages? I think it's technically fine as long as the md5sums are still there. If it's just sha1sums then I think the previous maintainer may have been feeling frisky
