On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 08:01:38PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote: > I'm confused. Does anyone know a better way to ensure g+w permissions > when we do this stuff? How does git maintain permissions when the repo > is set to shared? Would it be better to adjust the umask in the > dbscripts? > > Thoughts and opinions would be appreciated. > It looks like git uses umasks and setgid bits to accomplish this. Check out the manpage for git-init (under the --shared option) and the manpage for git-config (under core.sharedRepository).
I think we can get away with doing the same thing. -S
pgpKA7fhuETce.pgp
Description: PGP signature
