Am Montag 01 Dezember 2008 schrieb Ronald van Haren: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just throwing this out there - I'm not really stating my opinion on > > this, as I'm fairly neutral. > > > > Considering grub development is basically dead (waiting for grub2), > > what do you guys think about adding the splashimage patch to our > > official grub? See grub-gfx in community. I have used it for ages on > > my machine with no issues. It simply adds one config file variable. > > > > As I said, I'm neutral on this. It kinda flies in the face of the > > minimal patches idea, but grub is pretty much all patches these days. > > Are we sure there are no negative effects to the patch (the patch is > pretty big [1]) ? I don't have a strong opinion either, but I'm not > sure if/why we should fix something which isn't a problem just because > it looks nice, thereby possibly creating new problems ? > > Douglas, did you ever received messages / bug reports saying grub-gfx > did not work for them? > > Ronald > > [1] > http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/community/system/grub-gfx/grub-0.97-g >raphics.patch?view=markup&revision=1.1&root=community&pathrev=CURRENT Hi
Imho if we add this, we could also add back gpt support, which was imho fixed by gebra and then removed completly again. just my 2 cents on this greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
