On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 5:09 AM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Giovanni Scafora <[email protected]> > wrote: >> 2008/12/15, Tom K <[email protected]>: >>> pacbuild is an official Arch project - is the AUR the right place for it? >> >> imho pacbuild should be in extra. > > Has anyone on the dev team used it? Or maintained it or hacked on it? > I think we can hold it in a slightly different regard than other > packages on this list, but it has a lot of things going against it, > including seeing no love from any of us. In that respect, its a > defunct project and we usually don't keep those around. > > -Dan >
Hehehe... umm... I've used it, maintained it, and hacked on it. I started the damned project. I've also not picked it up for quite some time. No time these days. Plus I do less packaging myself. The git repo is still hosted on project.archlinux.org but the package itself isn't exactly production ready or really being used by anyone. Jason
