On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Thomas Bächler<[email protected]> wrote: > Aaron Griffin schrieb: >> >> I read through this, and was a little bit hesitant on this functionality. >> >> But then I gave in. Something about it feels weird to me, but if we >> just get it in there, it can be improved incrementally. > > What exactly feels weird? It's the best solution I could come up with that > a) doesn't add any new stuff (like new directories, files, concepts, we just > use functions.d) > b) works when multiple packages want to plug into the same hook
Oh no, I agree. It's a good implementation of the concept. We've been slinging this one around for some time. Still, my Spidey Sense is tingling a bit. I *think* it might be due to the free-form names, but I'm not sure. Like I said, if I figure it out later, we can always tweak things
