On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Andreas Radke<[email protected]> wrote: > i686 version is now also available. > > to the devs: please post your opinions where it should go after the > testing period? do you want it in extra or as official alternative even > in core? > > I'd prefer extra but would also like to see this kernel as a 2nd choice > on our future iso snapshots.
I agree it might be nice to have a choice, but I also think that if we're going to make sure something is stable, we should try to enforce some sort of signoff process, just to ensure it's all working ok
