Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] rfkill 0.3-3 (WAS: Re: [signoff] rfkill 0.3-2 (WAS: Re: [signoff] filesystem 2010.01-1-any && New package to core (or extra if you don't want core): rfkill))

[Thomas Bächler]

Am 13.01.2010 22:21, schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Giovanni Scafora
> <giova...@archlinux.org> wrote:
>> 2010/1/13, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgrif...@gmail.com>:
>>> As a dependency of filesystem? That doesn't make sense at all. Just
>>>  because we have a file with an optional entry doesn't make it a
>>>  dependency.
>>
>> Well, then we can put rfkill to extra, right?
> 
> I dunno. I don't fully understand it, to be honest, probably because I
> don't need it. What I do understand is that rfkill is related to
> wireless devices and connections. I think we should put it along with
> the rest of the wireless stuff

If your wireless doesn't work, it might be because it is soft-blocked
(that happened to lots of people with 2.6.31). Having it in core will be
helpful in such cases. However, I think this has been solved and
everything is unblocked these days.

rfkill will soon be an optdepend of netcfg, but it can still be in
extra. I have no arguments for any side.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature