On Mon, 10 May 2010 20:48:42 +0200, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 10 May 2010 19:03:59 +0200, Andrea Scarpino <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Monday 10 May 2010 18:40:16 Thomas Bächler wrote: >>> According to this: >>> > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-May/016721.html >>> >>> Can you please move libpopt.so* from /usr/lib to /lib? This would be >>> important for the next cryptsetup release to move to core. >>> >>> >>> Remark: To ensure proper dynamic linking, it should look like this: >>> /usr/lib/libpopt.a >>> /usr/lib/libpopt.so -> /lib/libpopt.so >>> /lib/libpopt.so -> libpopt.so.0 >>> /lib/libpopt.so.0 -> libpopt.so.0.X.Y >>> /lib/libpopt.so.0.X.Y >>> >>> Without the libpopt.so symlink in /usr/lib/, the linker will always >>> choose the static library over the dynamic one on build-time. I ran > into >>> problems with this a lot already :( >> libpopt.so* moved to /lib. >> >> please signoff both > > You moved libpopt.so to /lib also, this was supposed to be in /usr/lib > still.
Never mind, I looked incorrectly :(
