On 12/05/10 18:31, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 12.05.2010 09:46, schrieb Allan McRae:
Honestly, if I wanted comments about gcc and busybox, the subject of
this email would have been something like "busybox build issues with
gcc-4.5". And then I would have scolded myself for not using the bug
tracker.
Can I just have comments on the proposed CFLAGS?
Okay, then you'll get a comment on that: Our toolchain is terribly
broken as it is, let's break it further by adding more flags.
Terribly broken? 17% of our repo has been rebuilt since it moved to
[core] and 1 package has been reported broken due to gcc. That is 0.07%
of packages and even that has a workaround. How terrible...
So, do I really have to wait until that is fixed before we can discuss
_future_ changes?
Allan
