Am 29.07.2010 07:15, schrieb Allan McRae: > On 29/07/10 12:17, K. Piche wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 13:58 -0400, K. Piche wrote: >>> On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 09:18 +0200, Firmicus wrote: >>>> On 23/07/2010 03:16, Allan McRae wrote: >>>>> What is going on with the perl-5.12 update in [testing]? Every few >>>>> days I see rebuilds >>>>> for a couple of packages with "perl-5.12 rebuild" as the reason yet >>>>> we have no rebuild >>>>> list. How much more needs done? Is there any schedule for this >>>>> making it to the main repos? >>>>> >>>>> Allan >>>>> >>>> I have asked the same question to Kevin a few days ago, saying I >>>> could help him if needed. >>>> He replied on Tuesday, saying he was going to push it out on >>>> Wednesday. I replied that he >>>> needs to rebuild perl because I fixed the provides array in trunk >>>> since his last build >>>> (which was in May I think), and that he also needs to re-consider this: >>>> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13808 >>>> >>>> Have not heard back from him, but hopefully all this perl stuff will >>>> get out of testing soon. >>>> >>>> F >>> >>> I rebuilt perl with the updated provides array. I want to get this out >>> of testing so I'll deal with the stupid/annoying FHS bug later. >>> >>> If there's no objections I'll migrate perl tomorrow. >>> >>> k >> >> Speaking of which, I recall emails about removing the testing2* but they >> still exist so this is still the official method? > > testing2x is the way to go. If you have switched some packages to > arch=any you may need some intervention (but I am really not sure...)
There is still no testing2x-any, you need to run
testing2{core,extra}-any. For single-arch packages, testing2x and
testing2x64 work fine.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
