[2011-02-09 11:23:53 -0500] Stéphane Gaudreault: > 4) A compact version of vim
Since it is both maintained upstream and featureful, it seems like the most reasonable choice to me. And I personally think that the few additional 100KB compared to other vi's is worth it. > * May need a duplicate PKGBUILD as vim is in [extra] while vi is in [core] Would you still name that package "vi" and prevent it from conflicting with the vim of [extra]? Or something like "vim-tiny" that would conflict and provide vim? -- Gaetan