On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:54:57 +0200, Rémy Oudompheng wrote: > Signature files are optional and the previous behaviour > is unchanged when signatures files do not exist. > > Signed-off-by: Rémy Oudompheng <r...@archlinux.org> > --- > This patch was already posted with very slight differences > on the mailing-list by Allan. It needed several changes to > fit the current state of dbscripts. I hope this one will > allow to move forward. > > Still nothing in the test suite: we would need to run > gpg after the extra-*-build invocation and extra checks > for the presence/absence of signature files in the repos.
I am a little confused by this patch. If I get the current repo-add code right, gpg signatures will be base64 encoded and added to the db files. So there should be no need to provide .sig files for every single package. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre