Am 10.06.2011 11:43, schrieb Allan McRae: > On 10/06/11 19:34, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> Am 10.06.2011 11:30, schrieb Allan McRae: >>> This ususally happens with gcc and c++ programs so it is not really a >>> new thing. >> >> It almost never happens with C programs though. >> > > If you look at the output of "readelf -s /lib/libc.so.6" it happens > every glibc release... > > e.g. > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=103820 > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=103820
This is weird, the binaries I checked only required the GLIBC_2.7 and GLIBC_2.14 symbols.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

