Am 10.06.2011 11:43, schrieb Allan McRae:
> On 10/06/11 19:34, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Am 10.06.2011 11:30, schrieb Allan McRae:
>>> This ususally happens with gcc and c++ programs so it is not really a
>>> new thing.
>>
>> It almost never happens with C programs though.
>>
> 
> If you look at the output of "readelf -s /lib/libc.so.6" it happens
> every glibc release...
> 
> e.g.
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=103820
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=103820

This is weird, the binaries I checked only required the GLIBC_2.7 and
GLIBC_2.14 symbols.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to