On 31/10/11 06:09, Daniel Isenmann wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 19:06:21 +0100
Florian Pritz<bluew...@xinu.at> wrote:
On 30.10.2011 18:56, Daniel Isenmann wrote:
I'm building my packages exclusive on pkgbuild.com and there I can't
sign packages. If we do the switch in dbscripts then pkgbuild.com
should be ready to generate signed packages. As far as I know it
isn't possible yet, am I right?
So far the only solution is to download the finished package, sign it
locally using gpg --detach-sign<file> and then uploading the
signature back to pkgbuild.com so commitpkg will find it.
There has been some discussion [1] about remote signing for GPG, but I
think they dropped the idea.
[1]:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2011-June/042068.html
Kerrick Staley last comment [1] on this thread was that they will go
with the hash-signing implementation. But it seems that there is
nothing new on this topic.
[1]:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2011-June/042078.html
I'd be much more interested in a patch that actually lets you do remote
signing than a discussion that went nowhere...
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2011-July/026170.html
But then again, that patch went nowhere in the end too as far as I can tell.
Allan
