On 04/01/12 05:02, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 01/03/2012 08:43 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Allan McRae <al...@archlinux.org> wrote: >>> Do we want to do a mass rebuild for the packages in [extra] that are not >>> yet signed? >>> >>> There are currently 800 packages remaining unsigned. In December, >>> around 20 to 30 packages were newly signed, so if we stick at that rate >>> we will have [extra] fully signed by mid 2014... >>> >>> Allan >> >> FYI, there is a major libtiff and a minor xine-lib rebuild in the >> pipeline. They'll happen when the current db and libarchive rebuild >> will be done or maybe earlier if they don't overlap with each other. >> >> There is also an upcoming bash-completion rebuild (the completions >> will be moved from /etc to /usr/share) but I'm waiting for pacman 4 to >> leave testing for that. I'm not really sure why it's still in >> testing... >> > > ok then, libpng rebuild can wait until those are done. > > I'm not very happy starting this since we almost for sure need to patch > every package, unless they gained support in this time. >
Wouldn't the libpng and libtiff rebuilds overlap substantially. It might be worth doing both at the same time. Allan