Am 04.03.2012 01:19, schrieb Jouke Witteveen: > Dear Thomas and the rest, > >>> I would like to see someone package this work, that is available at >>> https://github.com/joukewitteveen/netcfg >>> and push a package to the (testing?) repository. >>> >>> I am not requesting maintainership of the code (Alfredo Palhares is >>> after it too), but I am willing to be the maintainer. My request is >>> just to move netcfg forward. >> >> Now, we need to make one of you the maintainer of the official netcfg >> tree on al.org. I don't know which one of you, so you two fight it out >> and tell us the result. Or, anyone else on this list, choose. I don't >> care, as long as I don't have to decide. >> > We have decided that I will take on maintainership and Alfredo and I > will keep in close contact for further development. > The tree at https://github.com/joukewitteveen/netcfg has seen some > fairly big changes lately, additionally fixing FS#25587 and FS#27496. > The new changes require a new PKGBUILD, which is included below (but > likely broken by Gmail). This is just for completeness to anyone > curious. > > I hope to get some details on maintainership soon. > > Regards, > - Jouke
So it seems we finally have someone who is willing to work on netcfg. Anyone who is interested in netcfg, please review the git tree. I propose to manually pull the tree and package it on Jouke's pull request. If the results are good, we might talk about direct git-shell access. Thoughts?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature