On Wednesday 15 August 2012 17:56:00 Thomas Bächler wrote: > Another point: Someone on the so-called "official" G+ stated: > > "Arch will move to systemd only boot process..." > > As Tom stated (and he maintains systemd and initscripts), this is not > true. This angers me because > > 1) Something untrue and/or unprecise is being posted on the "official" G+. > 2) There are claims that this G+ is official. Neither our website, nor > any place else states that there is an official Arch G+ (or Facebook) > page and links to it. This G+ has not been approved by developers to be > "official". Yet, someone here claims to be the official G+. > > This must stop. If we present ourselves on social media, I want it to be > approved on the private mailing list first. And if someone starts that > discussion, it will get a big -1 from me.
Well, I created that page on January and since then _we_ (managers' page: me, Ionut, Ray, s, Daniel) never write something which wasn't announced by our website. Until today. I don't know who write that (neither I wanna know), but you pointed out something true, so I already removed the "official" suffix from our page and "fixed" the post about systemd. I hope this is ok now. -- Andrea
