On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:48:56AM +0100, Jonathan Steel wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 11:21:45PM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 10:54:59PM -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Dave Reisner <d...@falconindy.com> wrote: > > > > I used to use this on a daily basis, but I now have zero use for it (and > > > > zero ability to test it). Anyone actually use this? It's pretty low > > > > maintenance -- I was pulling snapshots from svn/git with some bash > > > > voodoo I left in the PKGBUILD to generate snapshots. > > > > > > > > Two repos you say? svn because vpnc seems to refuse to tag a new > > > > release, and the repo is varying states of quiet to silent. git > > > > because an Intel employee actively maintains the shell scripts used on > > > > post-connect (/etc/vpnc/vpnc-script). > > > > > > > > I'll give this a week before dropping it to the AUR. > > > > > > > > d > > > > > > FTR, vpnc is used by a couple of packages: > > > archboot > > > networkmanager-vpnc > > > openconnect > > > > > > so it will need to stay in the repos unless we also remove or update > > > the dependencies of these packages. > > > > Uggh... I guess that means Ionut wants to take vpnc, since he maintains > > openconnect ;). Alternatively, there's no real issue with leaving vpnc > > in extra -- it just means it isn't going to be touched unless someone > > asks me to. > > > > d > > I use vpnc to connect to my work network, weekly or at least monthly and > would be happy to maintain it if you could drop it to [community]. > > -- > Jonathan Steel
I've already got an offer to move it to [community], but there's packages in [extra] which depend on it. In order to respect the repo hierarchy, vpnc needs to remain in [extra] unless those other packages are moved to [community] as well. d
