On Mon 24, March 15:02:53 Gaetan Bisson wrote: > Personally, although I think the AUR is a valuable service and that you > shouldn't be assuming its costs and maintenance alone, I'm not sure if > making it official would be a good thing (TM) in terms of encouraging > users to downgrade packages rather than reporting bugs and upgrading > cleanly when things break.
I want to quote Gaetan and Dave here. I fear that making ARM "official" or "semi-official" we unconsciously boost single packages downgrade. -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.