Hi On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Rashif Ray Rahman <[email protected]> wrote: > If there are no objections, I'll go ahead and push 3.x, which should > co-exist fine with 2.x. I suppose it's OK to break our naming > convention in cases like these.
Why to break it? Just push new opencv and opencv-2 to staging and create a TODO to rebuild all the dependencies.
