On 2017-01-09 04:26, Allan McRae wrote: > On 06/01/17 07:08, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: >> Friendly reminder what I'm going to push through if nobody opposes. > > Can we have a detailed discussion what EOL for i686 means? I have seen a > couple of proposals being: > > 1) We just kill i686 (as in stop distributing packages), or > 2) Reduce i686 to a secondary architecture. > > I want to see secondary architectures happen, so this would be a good > start in that direction. We start by advertising for a team that is > responsible for building and fixing i686 packages. At a certain point, > the only change to our tooling is that developers upload x86_64 only, > and the other team plays catchup (which should lead to autobuilding...) > > Allan >
I will write a news post draft proposing the latter this week. Bartłomiej
