On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:41:15PM +0200, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > Can we give more people from the devops team admin access there? We > already have too many places that only 1 or 2 of us can access. >
Sure. They just need to register an account on hub.docker.com and atlas.hashicorp.com and I can add them to the 'archlinux'[!sic] organisation on atlas (vagrant images) and hub.docker.com (docker container). > > His docker container is a huge improvement to the other docker > > containers in the hub. Most of them are insecure, ship private keys > > within the container or ship more applications as needed. > > Any reason systemd is there? Recursive removal cuts off 30MB. The fact > that libldap depends on e2fsprogs also seems wrong. I know, "patches > welcome". There is a dependency cycle, thats why systemd got pulled in. I got already some feedback to the container and the image and I am pretty sure we can reduce the size of the container a little bit more. Currently the docker container is 152mb big in compressed state and around 425mb or something uncompressed. I would also like to have a second container repository with a container that has base and base-devel, for stuff like jenkins etc. > Given yours and Pierre's involvement, it can already be considered official. Ok I didn't know it's that easy. > Does it really needs a separate channel? Don't we have > #archlinux-projects for that? Sorry, I didn't know that #archlinux-projects exists. The channel is a good idea.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
