On 2017-11-06 11:36, Alad Wenter via arch-dev-public wrote: >> Bartłomiej Piotrowski <bpiotrow...@archlinux.org> hat am 6. November 2017 um >> 11:21 geschrieben: >> >> Slightly changing the topic... We have plenty of space on our >> PIA-sponsored mirrors. Given that said fork pretty strictly follows our >> PKGBUILDs (much alike to ARM team), I'd like to host arch32 mirrors >> there as well. What do you think? >> > I don't mind, but in the end it's up to those who pay for the mirrors. > > It does bring up the topic again on how the Arch community will support > arch32. Does hosting arch32 mirrors give the impression that we support the > fork through our channels, or is that unrelated? How will we otherwise react > on support requests for or from arch32? IMO, the announcement is vague on > that. > > (Personally I would support the idea of having both projects under a common > umbrella. But by now arch32 has their own support infrastructure, including > forums). > > Alad >
Some clarification. Our mirrors under pkgbuild.com domains shouldn't be considered official or any better than other mirrors. We just happen to maintain additional mirrors on these machines, nothing more. Donated infrastructure can disappear tomorrow (or never) and is not considered "core" for which we pay ourselves. Hosting any mirror there does not show our endorsement.
