On March 17, 2019 11:13:31 PM GMT+01:00, Gaetan Bisson via arch-dev-public <[email protected]> wrote: >[2019-03-17 19:07:23 +0100] Bruno Pagani via arch-dev-public: >> This is a follow-up on the last month discussion about a “minimal >base >> system”. > >Creating a new thread removed from the discussion we had a month ago >just makes it so much harder for all of us to remember what everyone's >arguments and counter-arguments were. Please do not do this. For my >part, I thought we had reached consensus with Allan's message: > > > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2019-February/029471.html > >Summary: You propose what you want your new group to be (metapackage, > list of dependencies, etc.) and we adopt this as the new base. > >If that is not satisfactory to you, please reply to that specific >message and say why. That would have been far more constructive than >your present message which rehashes some of the discussion we've >already >had and adds new questions I have no idea where you're going with. >
I thought so too, also don't really see why we need a different set than the one already proposed but curious to hear. I just didn't went any further yet to give more time for people to potentially talk about something not yet mentioned. I don't quite see why we are facing something very time critical here so it's fine to wait a bit and give people enough room to feel comfortable with this whole change. Cheers, Levente
