On 2019-09-02 23:56:39 (-0400), Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote: > I've gotten several positive responses and no negative ones so far. > Although it's been noted that it might be nice to have a more > lightweight convert tool packaged, I think for now we can stick with the > one in qt5-webengine. > > Anyone else have any last-minute objections? Should I create a TODO list > for all our dictionary packages? Not that it is of our direct concern, but qt5-webengine seems to suffer from unresolved questionable licensing issues, which is why e.g. Parabola doesn't package it [1]. I don't know the specifics, but assume, that it is due to the Chromium license [2].
Best, David [1] https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=qt5- [2] https://github.com/qt/qtwebengine/blob/5.12/LICENSE.Chromium -- https://sleepmap.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
