Hi, On 06-12-19, Maxime Gauduin via arch-dev-public wrote: > Hi Baptiste, > > Since I have 2 packages depending on it, I may have to take it off your > hands.
Thanks for the proposal, having a maintainer that actually uses the package will be a real improvement over the current situation! > That said, I've been considering dropping clementine to AUR for a > while. It needs a lot of patching, is built from an unstable qt5 > branch, and has a lot of better alternatives, including a fully > featured qt5 fork named strawberry. > > rbutil is another beast, they release once every 10 years and crypto++ > was introduced in the very latest that was released less than a month > ago. I don't think there's a solution for this one. I had a look and indeed, rbutil really needs crypto++: https://git.rockbox.org/?p=rockbox.git;a=commit;h=dbeb6db1b55a50dedf17e7d78ddb6fe9eebc2a63 https://git.rockbox.org/?p=rockbox.git;a=commit;h=8b3f5a8ad7434850804a4a664d2b07c6ffa9b1c7 https://git.rockbox.org/?p=rockbox.git;a=commit;h=759a78e5dff134f2632875f61aae60815eea6f5b So, if you want to keep rbutil, crypto++ should indeed stay in our repositories as well. Baptiste
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
