On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 12:18 PM Allan McRae via arch-dev-public < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 21/12/19 7:31 pm, Evangelos Foutras via arch-dev-public wrote: > > Downstream consumers of libx11 shouldn't have to know and account for > > libx11's headers/pkg-config files referencing xorgproto. A > > libx11-devel package would depend on xorgproto. Since there's no > > separate -devel package, the dependency stays with the regular libx11 > > package. > > This matches my opinion on the matter. > Ditto. (a) and (c) are the technically correct solutions, and I prefer (a). Unless we want to start a distro-wide effort of splitting out -devel packages, that is.
