On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 23:52, Dieter Plaetinck <[email protected]> wrote: > About the froscon idea: I think it pulls away some attention from Arch > if there are too many other things to do, and it's less "cousy" but you > get a lot of advantages (logistics taken care of, maybe some interested > people stopping by).
True. However at FrOSCon and FOSDEM there were dev rooms specifically for talks about one project (e.g. PHP room, KDE room), so with a dedicated Arch room for talks this can be just fine (and we get extra visitors from the main conference :-P). > What makes an Archcon an archcon, and not "arch devs present at > conference $foo" is mostly Arch talks. lots of Arch talks, but I think > that won't be an issue. If every dev I'v met so far at froscon/fosdem > gives 1 presentation, you can easily fill 2 days :) Very true. > I don't know what you're referring to with the froscon organising > complaints though. Maybe Roman's issues with the visa, but that's a > problem with the german embassy, not froscon (afaik). actually it's froscon's team slowness that was the main problem -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич) _______________________________________________ arch-events mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-events
