On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/4/1, Loui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Do we need a GPL1 and GPL1+? > > > > Seems like we would need a GPL1. GPL1+ is logically the same as GPL > > since there are no previous versions (are there?) > > I haven't seen a single piece of code licensed under GPLv1 ever. :-)
Ok. How about this. Lets assume "GPL" means 1.0 and up. Problem solved because it will... *ahem, let me clear my throat* never ever ever ever ever ever happen.
