On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Giovanni Scafora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/5/1 bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Why? It's true that we're all waiting for our own testing repo, but > > using unstable won't help: the problem is AUR integration: a lot of > > work still has to be done before community can move to svn, and then > > support for an overlay repo has to be added from scratch. > > The unstable repo is using svn now. > Maybe, we could rename it to community? We have community repo already, hand svn packages to community may work, but I still think it could be better to distinguish such packages from anothers. Unstable repo is useless if only a few people use it. Drop it if we can't make it more useful, that's why I propose for a rename, to try to bring it to the right direction. -- > Giovanni Scafora > Arch Linux Trusted User (voidnull) > http://www.archlinux.org > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
