Re: [arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?

[Daenyth Blank]

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 05:32, Magnus Therning<mag...@therning.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ed Jobs<olori...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Monday 13 July 2009 11:49, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
>>> to the dev:
>>> why not rename vi package to nvi ?
>>
>> +1 to that
>
> Sounds like a good idea, especially since nvi _isn't_ vi in the strictest 
> sense.
>
Neither is vim. To my understanding, nvi emulates original vi more
closely than the old vi package.