On 20.07.2009 15:46, Andrei Thorp wrote: > Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of Sun Jul 19 00:00:53 -0400 2009: > >> So the package is out-of-date and the new version does not build? Could >> be a reason why it is not updated... >> > > I recall Blender not having support for python 2.6 at some point (while > we had 2.6). It seems some folks have now successfully built Blender > with 2.6 support, but it seeems woefully unofficial. > > I wonder what can be done about that. > Doesn't Blender 2..49a have Python 2.6 support by default? At least the Windows downloads on blender.org come with Python 2.5 OR Python 2.6.
- [arch-general] What to do about the "blender"... Sven-Hendrik Haase
- Re: [arch-general] What to do about the "blen... Allan McRae
- Re: [arch-general] What to do about the "... Lukáš Jirkovský
- Re: [arch-general] What to do about the &q... Roman Kyrylych
- Re: [arch-general] What to do about th... Alessandro Doro
- Re: [arch-general] What to do abo... Sven-Hendrik Haase
- Re: [arch-general] What to do... Alessandro Doro
- Re: [arch-general] What t... Sven-Hendrik Haase
- Re: [arch-general] What to do about the "blen... Andrei Thorp
- Re: [arch-general] What to do about the "... Sven-Hendrik Haase
- Re: [arch-general] What to do about the &q... Andrei Thorp