On 12/03/10 07:57, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 14:59 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou<ji...@gmx.net> wrote:
My primary complaint against flyspray is that it doesn't allow comments to
be added after the bug is closed. The only way is by doing a request to
reopen the bug, and even in that case your comment is not added to the
comment list.
Wouldn't this functionality remedy the "closing bugs early" situation? Is it
supported in flyspray?
Commenting on bugs after they are closed will just annoy the
developer. If you have an issue with the fix or something, reopening
is the right action. If you have information to add, then add it to
the wiki, as THAT is the source of documentation, not flyspray
You should consider moving to bugzilla. mozilla and gnome use it. it's
an excellent bug tracker. I've used it to report literally hundreds or
gnome or mozilla bugs. not only is it easier on developers but it is
also better for users. flyspray is not as smart as bugzilla.
this won't work of course if there is no converter.
You seriously think bugzilla is easier to use? I think the only
advantage of moving to bugzilla is that we would get less bug reports as
the interface would put most people off. Since using Flyspray, I
really, really, really hate having to file bug reports in bugzilla
(which is why I encourage users to file bugs upstream).
Allan
