On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Dave Reisner <d...@falconindy.com> wrote:
> , but of course upstream should have, imo, versioned it
> as 2.14.01 to avoid this kind of nonsense.
>
to upstream that translates to

2.014001

which is less than

2.15

honestly what upstream should have done is made 2.1401 2.15 and now
2.15 would be 2.16


-- 
Caleb Cushing

http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com

Reply via email to