> It seems that while most (all?) distributions include a /usr/bin/python3 link > to their python3.xbinary, none do the same thing for python2.x. Either create > your own symlink in your path for those distros or even better file a bug > with them asking for such a symlink. They are going to need one in the future…
I wanted to also clarify something or ask if someone could possibly clarify for me: where has it been established that Python 3 will become the replacement for the default Python binary? Is there a possibility that the standard convention might become python and python3 as binaries, where python is 2.7.x and python3 is the latest release of 3? I'm sure that this has already been discussed elsewhere or within the Python community itself, so if anyone could just point me in the direction I'd really appreciate it. Thank you!
