At Samstag, 13. November 2010 17:32 Heiko Baums wrote: > And I have nothing against cleaning up a repo. But this should be done > more considered. Means only unimportant, unpopular packages or packages > which don't run anymore should be moved to AUR or removed completely but > not packages which likely belong to the most popular ones.
+1 For to consider more. With only a message with the link to a wiki list it is very easy to oversee something and more important there is no information about to what for a certain time it will be done. I have not anything against having more (or less) applications from aur but i was a little bit surprised as my favorite editor for the console joe get throwed out of extra. So i ask for the possibility of having a RSS Feed (or a web page) with at examples such lines 2010-11-10 joe -> OLD REPO: EXTRA NEW REPO: AUR 2010-11-10 appXYZ -> OLD REPO: EXTRA NEW REPO: NULL 2010-11-12 libXYZ -> OLD REPO: COMMUNITY NEW REPO: EXTRA Is there any change that this could realize without too much extra cost? See you, Attila
