On the forums, we see an increasing number of threads about ArchBang. Understandably so, since not only does it carry "Arch" in the name, it also uses the same styling [1], and supposedly users are told there to use the Arch wiki and forum for support.
People are asking if ArchBang is an official Arch project [2], which it obviously isn't. ArchBang is more a one-click or no-config install which goes against the Arch philosophy. Also our Forum Etiquette states that community support is _only_ given for installations done from official Arch installation media [3]. While ArchBang (and probably some other spin-off distros) are very similar and sometimes almost identical to Arch, they are _not_ Arch and in my opinion this should be made more clear to avoid any damage to the Arch project as a whole. What are your thoughts about this? I'm hoping to get an official reaction from our dev-team, so we can avoid some of the confusion that is present now. [1] http://archbang.org/ [2] https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=889066#p889066 [3] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Forum_Etiquette#How_to_Post
