n Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Thomas S Hatch <thatc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> I also agree with this, but I wanted to avoid saying it lest we get into >> another debate about systemd on here. But yes, systemd does seem to go >> against >> the grain of the UNIX Philosophy and the Arch Way. >> > > I agree, no need to flame, we have flamed before on this :) > > In the end, I trust the Arch Devs to make the right call, they have not let > us down before! > Agreed on this =)
- [arch-general] Systemd! [WAS: arch-dev-public] Welcoming D... Oon-Ee Ng
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd! [WAS: arch-dev-public] We... Bernardo Barros
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd! [WAS: arch-dev-public] We... jwbirdsong
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd! [WAS: arch-dev-public] We... Yaro Kasear
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd! [WAS: arch-dev-public... Thomas S Hatch
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd! [WAS: arch-dev-pu... Yaro Kasear
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd! [WAS: arch-de... Thomas S Hatch
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd! [WAS: ar... Oon-Ee Ng
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd! [WAS... Bernardo Barros
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd! ... Yaro Kasear
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd! ... Evan LeCompte