On 22/08/11 03:10, Myra Nelson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 02:52, Allan McRae<al...@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 21/08/11 17:40, Myra Nelson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:28, Dan McGee<dpmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
For the daring, pick your poison (by architecture):
* pacman -U
http://dev.archlinux.org/~dan/pacman-4.0.0rc1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
* pacman -U
http://dev.archlinux.org/~dan/pacman-4.0.0rc1-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz
Allan, Dave, and I (and probably a few others) run pacman-git on most
of our systems with no problems, so their should be no real shockers
or problems if you give this a spin. There are no database upgrades or
changes this time so downgrading later should work fine if truly
necessary.
What we're looking for feedback on:
* any build failures in makepkg you may see
* if you manage a custom repo, how does repo-add work for you
* does pacman behave as it did before
* if you want to sign packages, does the functionality in makepkg and
the documentation make sense
* same for signing repos- does it work for you
What we know isn't there yet:
* translations
* a developer keyring (or keyring package)- if you delve into this,
you will need to look at pacman-key for now
* great error messages on verification failure, or ability to import
keys on the fly if it is unknown
Note that we'd love testing even if you don't plan on touching any of
the new signing stuff- there were 500+ commits worth of changes in
this release, including a switch to curl as the download library, so
anything out of the ordinary should be reported. Please choose -git as
the version in the bugtracker if you do it that way, otherwise email
pacman-dev.
Happy testing!
-Dan
This may not be in the right place but I just experienced an error
while upgrading. This is the first hiccup I've noticed since
installing the pacman-4.0.0.rc1. I put a copy of the pacman log for
the last two days and the error messages I'm receiving here:
http://pastebin.com/WsCJPpqk .
This is a sample of the error, :: File
/var/cache/pacman/pkg/avahi-0.6.30-5-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted
(invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)). It was the same for
device-mapper, eject, fakeroot, and lvm2.
I tried changing mirrors from rit.edu to mirrors1.kernel.org and
resyncing with pacman -Syy. I still received the same errors. Other
packages upgraded just fine, inetutils; net-tools; atool. Since I'm
not familiar enough with the pacman code I'm not sure where to go
next. If I need to file a bug report I will be glad to.
Use --debug to get more detailed error messages.
Basically, signatures are now being included in our repo databases. You do
not have them in your pacman keyring so pacman can not validate the package.
Read the man pages for pacman-key and pacman.conf to find out more on how
to configure your system to deal with this.
You can get developer keys from:
http://www.archlinux.org/developers/
Allan
Works like a charm. Thanks again for the assistance. I missed #GPGDir
= /etc/pacman.d/gnupg/ in the new pacman.conf file or I would have
investigated further. I only had one other problem, importing Andreas
Radke's key. I get a key not found error both when I click the link on
the developers page and when I try to import the key with pacman-key.
You can get it from:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Signing_Packages/Packager_Keys
Allan
