On 11/15/11 at 11:57pm, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 15 November 2011 22:00, Manolo Martínez <man...@austrohungaro.com> wrote: > The policy had already been revised when the split was made to have > vim and gvim. Vim had to become lightweight as many people were > complaining about its bulk. > > Thanks for the explanation, Ray. I guess I should learn to make do without copying among X programs, as those people doubtlessly do. Manolo
- [arch-general] Vim with X Manolo Martínez
- Re: [arch-general] Vim with X Jelle van der Waa
- Re: [arch-general] Vim with X Manolo Martínez
- Re: [arch-general] Vim with X Ray Rashif
- Re: [arch-general] Vim with X Manolo Martínez
- Re: [arch-general] Vim with X John K Pate
- Re: [arch-general] Vim with X Fons Adriaensen
- Re: [arch-general] Vim with X Taylor Hedberg
- Re: [arch-general] Vim with X Manolo Martínez
- Re: [arch-general] Vim with X Jason Melton
- Re: [arch-general] Vim with X Manolo Martínez
- Re: [arch-general] Vim with X Ray Rashif
- Re: [arch-general] Vim with X Manolo Martínez
- Re: [arch-general] Vim with X Bastien Dejean
- Re: [arch-general] Vim with X Bastien Dejean