Am 16.01.2012 22:12, schrieb Karol Blazewicz: > Is it for real or is it an error? > > I know that you should merge pacnew files first, I'm fine with the > move, but something tells me we're going to see many users baffled by > pacman throwing never-before seen errors. > Not that I mind Arch being a less hand-holding distro and actually > requiring common sense ;P
Your question is probably about signatures. We're not entirely there yet, but as pacman 4 brings lots of other fixes and improvements, it was a good idea to move it. If you want to use signed packages (and are okay that databases aren't signed yet, and not everything is signed), you can follow [1]. [1] http://allanmcrae.com/2011/12/pacman-package-signing-4-arch-linux/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
