On 04/25/2012 10:25 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > While dependencies (done in the right way) might have been nice to > have, I don't see this as a major shortcoming of our current system, > and if we are to change away from initscripts the replacement would > have to provide significantly better benefits than that, in my humble > opinion.
KISS - If it "ain't" broke, don't fix it.... I'm sure some may have needs that exceed what the current initscripts can provide, the simple efficient Arch way has done, and continues to do, quite well. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
