On 08/09/2012 01:55 AM, Myra Nelson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Dave Reisner <d...@falconindy.com> wrote: >> On Aug 8, 2012 6:04 PM, "Allan McRae" <al...@archlinux.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 09/08/12 05:29, Tobias Powalowski wrote: >>>> Am 08.08.2012 21:25, schrieb Evangelos Foutras: >>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Tobias Powalowski >>>>> <tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>>> It was just a rebuild, with an added optdepend :/ >>>>>> Sorry folks, didn't want to break something. >>>>>> I don't have the time now to look at it. >>>>> Seems like a patch was added: avoid-using-ext2_fs.patch. >>>>> >>>>> I took the liberty to remove the package from [testing] until we >>>>> figure out what's broken. >>>> The patch is from fedora, to be able to build syslinux. >>>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/syslinux.git/tree/ >>>> >>> >>> It is needed as the ext2 fs stuff has been removed from the kernel >> headers. >>> >>> Allan >>> >> >> Incidentally it also causes ext2 /boot to be unbootable. > > Incidentally it also causes ext2 /boot to be unbootable, without a > doubt it does. > > Dave's install scripts work great easiest install I've ever done, > however it won't boot off of ext2 with syslinux. >
Why do you want ext2 on /boot? All bootloaders support ext3/4 this days. > Myra > -- Ionuț
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
