On 08/10/2012 08:54 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Baho Utot <baho-u...@columbus.rr.com> wrote:
On 08/10/2012 08:11 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
OT: Btw. it would be nice if everybody has got the choice to use or not
to use systemd. IMO there's no need to talk about pros and cons,
Poettering again and again. I suspect we use different mail clients,
daemons etc. too.
Sadly, I don't think in the long run that will be possible, given that
systemd has taken over udev and udev is now a part of systemd.
In April 2012, udev's source tree was merged into systemd.
That's not a problem. We currently use udev from the sysntemd-tools
package with initsrcipts (as well as many other tools that systemd
provides), and I do not expect this to cause problems anytime soon.
The only issue I see with supporting more than one init system is that
it means more work for the packagers.
-t
Yes but part of systemd is installed with udev as I understand it?
Have you tried to strip out udev from systemd so you can use sysvinit
without anything from systemd ?
