[2012-08-15 14:01:16 +0200] Felipe Contreras: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Bächler <tho...@archlinux.org> wrote: > > Am 15.08.2012 13:34, schrieb Felipe Contreras: > >> No. The "services" (in systemd lingo) should be in an interpreted > >> language: e.g. shell. > > > > Why should they be? As far as I understand, they're human-readable text > > files. One might say this is an "interpreted language". > > No, they are compiled binaries. The code is in C (not interpreted).
Please just shut up when you obviously have no clue what you are talking about. -- Gaetan
