On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:24:21AM +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > Heiko Baums <li...@baums-on-web.de> wrote: > > Am Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:15:39 -0400 > schrieb Dave Reisner <d...@falconindy.com>: > > > I apologize for this being somewhat after-the-fact. It was discussed > > on IRC, but that of course doesn't necessarily cater to a wide enough > > audience. Some of you have probably already noticed that systemd 189 > > now provides, conflicts, and replaces libsystemd and systemd-tools. > > This is the next logical step since systemd will eventually be in > > base once we have sufficient unit coverage. > > > > As an added bonus, maybe this will encourage people who haven't > > switched over yet to do so. ;) > > "Nobody is forcing systemd on anybody." > > Wasn't it this what was always said by the devs in all those long > threads about systemd? And what are you doing now? Isn't this not > forcing it on everybody? > > "Nobody has the intention to build a wall." > > Heiko > > > Up till now you didn't have a choice, you had to use initscripts and you > liked it. Why don't you take over maintenance of them so people can keep > using them? Systemd and sysvinit aren't the only inits out there, there is runit, upstart, openrc all of which are available in the aur
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Init -- Daniel Wallace Archlinux Trusted User (gtmanfred) Georgia Institute of Technology
pgpWoYuHuzBFT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
