> Yeah, that sounds like a sensible reason; thank you. I believe Arnaud's usecase > is a single container with no particularly special connectivity requirements (as > far as I can tell). I'm worried that he's making his setup a lot more complicated > than it needs to be. > See my previous post : I want to learn. Then, the container will one day be a production server. So my idea is to test now everything, then take a snapshot and build a prod server with much more complicated network services and settings.
- Re: [arch-general] tap device arnaud gaboury
- Re: [arch-general] tap device Paul Gideon Dann
- Re: [arch-general] tap device Mauro Santos
- Re: [arch-general] tap device Paul Gideon Dann
- Re: [arch-general] tap device Mauro Santos
- Re: [arch-general] tap device Paul Gideon Dann
- Re: [arch-general] tap device arnaud gaboury
- Re: [arch-general] tap device Paul Gideon Dann
- Re: [arch-general] tap device Mauro Santos
- Re: [arch-general] tap device Paul Gideon Dann
- Re: [arch-general] tap device arnaud gaboury
- Re: [arch-general] tap device Paul Gideon Dann
- Re: [arch-general] tap device arnaud gaboury
- Re: [arch-general] tap device arnaud gaboury
- Re: [arch-general] tap device Paul Gideon Dann
- Re: [arch-general] tap device arnaud gaboury
- Re: [arch-general] tap device arnaud gaboury
- Re: [arch-general] tap device arnaud gaboury